Law question
QUESTION 1
-
The Supreme Court reduced law enforcement’s authority to search the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to arrest in:
undefined
Arizona v. Gant. |
||
Carroll v. United States. |
||
United States v. Simmons. |
||
New York v. Belton. |
QUESTION 2
-
Which case concerns the plain view doctrine?
Bell v. Wolfish |
||
Katz v. United States |
||
Horton v. California |
||
Arizona v. Gant |
QUESTION 3
-
Which of the following is not one of the criteria that must be met for plain view?
The original intrusion is legal only because it is pursuant to a valid warrant. |
||
The items are plainly observed while in the permissible scope of the original intrusion. |
||
The original intrusion is legal because the officers are present legally. |
||
The items are immediately recognizable as evidence or contraband. |
QUESTION 4
-
Searches of vehicles during an arrest of an occupant are allowed only if the officer has a reasonable belief that the arrestee can gain access to the vehicle or that __________ will be found in the vehicle.
contraband |
||
weapons |
||
evidence of the crime of arrest |
||
evidence of any crime |
QUESTION 5
-
When government agents are lawfully executing a warrant, they:
must obtain another warrant if they find additional illegal items. |
||
can seize any contraband, even if not specified in the warrant. |
||
will continue searching the premises even after finding the items specified in the warrant. |
||
can take anything they want for any reason.QUESTION 6
QUESTION 7
QUESTION 8
QUESTION 9
|
SAMPLE ASSIGNMENT